Abstract
Introduction:
The presence of the Philadelphia chromosome has historically been associated with a poor prognosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Prior studies had demonstrated that the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate among adult patients with Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL was 25% compared to 41% in Philadelphia-chromosome negative (Ph-) ALL (Moorman et. al. Blood 2007). While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has long been regarded as the standard of care for adult Ph+ ALL patients despite its significant transplant-related morbidity and mortality, its benefit is less clear in the era of newer-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as dasatinib.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study at a single urban transplant center with academic affiliation to analyze the outcomes of adult patients diagnosed with Ph+ ALL between 2005-2018. Patients were treated with either combination chemotherapy plus dasatinib or combination chemotherapy plus dasatinib and allogeneic HSCT. Chemotherapy regimens included hyper-CVAD, Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster-like (BFM-like) protocol, and a regimen developed at the University of Southern California (USC ALL regimen) using pegaspargase (Douer et. al. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014). All patients in both the transplant group and the non-transplant group received TKI therapy with dasatinib throughout their treatment courses; in the former, patients received dasatinib both prior to and following their transplants. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher Exact Probability Test with p-values <0.05 deemed significant.
Results:
A total of 71 Ph+ ALL patients were included in this study. Forty-three patients (60.5%) were male and the median age at the time of diagnosis was 44 years (range 20-69). Median follow-up time was 15 months (range 1-131). Chemotherapy regimens included the USC ALL regimen in 69.8% of patients, hyper-CVAD in 25.6%, and BFM-like protocol in 7%. While in remission, 31 (43.6%) patients underwent allogeneic HSCT with subsequent post-transplant dasatinib therapy. Median time of dasatinib initiation following transplant was at day 102. Matched related donor transplants were performed in 48% of patients, matched unrelated donor transplants in 24%, and haploidentical donor transplants in 29% of patients. In comparing OS rates, 1-year OS was 92.9% vs. 100% (p = 0.49), 2-year OS was 90.1% vs. 83.3% (p = 0.60), and 3-year OS was 75% vs. 62.5% (p = 0.64) in the allogeneic HSCT group compared to the non-transplant group, respectively (Figure 1). The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates also proved to be similar at 70.5% in the allogeneic HSCT group and 80.1% in the non-transplant group (p = 0.94, Figure 2). In addition, 37% of patients had a poor prognostic factor of a white blood count (WBC) >30 x 109/L at the time of diagnosis. When comparing rates of OS and RFS between transplant vs. non-transplant patients in this group, there was also no significant difference.
Conclusion:
This study showed that in the management of adult Ph+ ALL patients, there was no significant difference in OS or RFS between patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT compared to those who received only combination chemotherapy with dasatinib. In addition, prior studies of Ph+ ALL patients treated with either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy followed by HSCT concluded that the OS rates were approximately 50%, 35%, and 30% at the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year marks, respectively (Rowe et. al. Blood 2005). Our analysis, however, demonstrated improved rates of survival at all time points for this patient population with the addition of dasatinib. Subgroup analysis of patients with a WBC >30 x 109/L at the time of diagnosis also showed no significant difference in OS between transplant and non-transplant patients despite previous reports showing a survival benefit from HSCT (Huang et. al. Blood 2016). This may be attributed to the fact that our patients received the newer and more potent agent dasatinib compared to imatinib in these prior studies. Since allogeneic HSCT demonstrated no survival benefit in our study and can also introduce risks of serious infectious complications, venoocculsive disease (VOD), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that contribute to patient morbidity and mortality, it may serve a less beneficial role for the Ph+ ALL population in the era of newer-generation TKIs.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal